Mirrored: 5th of May 2010, 19:36 Original: climateinc.org Views: 81 Settings: Loading the mirror...
Link: archives: April 2010 Link: archives: March 2010 Link: archives: February 2010 Link: archives: January 2010 Link: archives: December 2009 Link: archives: November 2009 Link: archives: October 2009 Link: archives: September 2009 Link: archives: August 2009 Link: archives: July 2009 Link: index: Climate Inc. Link: start: Back to Petroleum? Link: prev: Sustainable Energy: Perspectives from the US and Europe Link: next: Cleantech's Unsung Heroes Climate Inc. The Business of Stopping Climate Change _____________________ [ ] * Home * About Climate Inc. * About the Editor * Keep in Touch * Resources Climate Change and Clean Tech in Israel January 12, 2010 Tags: Israel, McKinsey McKinsey report front picture Israel is a small country of 7.5 million people with an oversized political and media footprint. It also has a growing carbon footprint problem on its current development path, as noted in the November 2009 McKinsey report on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Potential in Israel (the 5-page summary is in English, click here for full Hebrew version). At the same time, Israel has a very strong clean tech sector, with the potential to make a huge contribution to reducing global emissions. The country faces a serious long-term strategic threat from climate change. The largest population centers are along the coastal plain, just a few meters above sea level, and regional projections point to a decline in winter precipitation of 10-20%, increasing the likelihood of severe droughts. Although more than half the population considers climate change to be a serious threat, there has been little governmental attention to emissions until recently, and even the McKinsey report neglects the potential physical impacts of climate change. During my visit to Israel in December 2009, I gave a talk at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, on climate governance (drawing from A Tale of Two Meltdowns), and my Israeli colleague from the university organized a meeting with the Minister of Environmental Protection, Gilad Erdan, and several of his staff, to talk about Israel's plans for reducing GHG emissions and ways of engaging Israeli industry. Historically, environmental protection has been a relatively low priority in Israel, in light of more pressing security and economic development concerns. Israel has a standard of living approaching European levels, yet because it's still classified as a developing country in the climate regime, it did not have binding obligations under the Kyoto process. Nevertheless, Erdan has been pushing for the country to adopt aggressive emissions targets, and is seeking ways to get the government as well as industry on board. The key to advancing the climate agenda in this particular environment is to link it to other national priorities, in order to elevate its strategic significance and build the political coalition needed for action and investment. The Environment ministry recognizes this, and the McKinsey report notes four benefits that would accompany climate action: Israel climate benefits action An important motive for Israel's ambitious GHG goals is to graduate from developing to developed country status, with a view to joining the OECD. This would offer broader economic benefits through trade and investment as well as improved international legitimacy. Israel's active engagement in promoting clean development regionally and supplying critical technologies for global emissions reductions would also bolster its international status, enhance exports, and potentially provide a source of carbon credits. Energy security is clearly an important goal, as Israel is almost completely dependent on imported fossil fuels, including natural gas from Egypt. Yet current thinking is that energy security means independence through greater reliance on local renewables, primarily solar. My own view is that energy security can be linked to national security and pursued through regional energy collaboration, primarily with Egypt and Jordan. Though the McKinsey report lists solar power, both CST (concentrating solar thermal) and PV as the single largest contributor to Israel's GHG reduction potential, the reality is that suitable land is quite limited, even in the southern Negev desert. Collaboration with Egypt and Jordan would open up the possibility of developing a regional grid drawing from large-scale CST in the Sinai desert, southern Jordan, even perhaps northern Saudi Arabia. Moreover, the intermittency of solar can be somewhat offset when complemented with wind power, which has very limited potential in Israel (McKinsey estimates at around 600MW), but is far more abundant in neighboring countries. Of course, Israel does not want to be dependent on its Arab neighbors for energy. A regional grid would provide security through interdependence. Israel could be a key supplier of technology, as well as a conduit of power between Egypt and Jordan. Economic and technological collaboration on the scale required would also, one hopes, improve political relations. During the 1950s and 1960s, Israel made considerable diplomatic gains in Africa and parts of Asia from its contributions to international economic development. More ambitiously, if a Mideast regional grid were tied into the proposed Desertec supergrid, European participation would provide a strong political guarantee of supply security, as well as smoothing out supply intermittency issues (update: PWC released a report in April 2010 with a roadmap to 100% renewable power based on an integrated Europe-N. Africa supergrid). DESERTEC supergrid Israel has a strong clean tech sector as part of the larger high-tech cluster and entrepreneurial culture in the country (see Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle). The solar thermal and PV clusters are particularly well developed, and the country is home to major firms in water purification and desalination, geothermal energy, and other areas (see here and here, and Jonathan Shapira's excellent blog on Israeli clean tech). The internal market, however, is far too small to benefit very much from Israel's own emissions reductions efforts. The large economic payoff will come from exports, technology licensing, and international joint ventures in which Israel is the source for R&D, software, and high value components. BrightSource Industries Israel, for example, a descendent of the CST pioneer Luz, is now a subsidiary of California-based Brightsource Energy, and supplies R&D, engineering services, and key components for the company's global markets. In fact, the Israeli tech sector is remarkable for its success despite the absence of advanced local markets - during my MBA at Tel Aviv University, I wrote some case studies on how Israeli companies operated within virtual clusters, with their major markets and sources of capital in Europe and the US. Israel's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Potential Though Israel's total emissions are tiny in global terms, at 71 MtCO2e in 2005, they are growing rapidly, and expected to double by 2030 in a "business as usual" scenario. Emissions per head are already 10.2 tons, about the European average, and expected to rise to more than 14 tons by 2030. The structural reasons for this relatively high and growing carbon footprint are the country's dependence on coal for power, under investment in public transportation, weak building standards, and high rates of economic and population growth. The country is also committed to energy gobbling large-scale water desalination projects. The McKinsey report estimates that implementation of abatement measures could reduce emissions by about 45 MtCO2e, corresponding to 2/3 of the expected GHG emissions growth and about 1/3 of total expected BAU emissions in 2030. Behavioral changes, such as reduced air conditioning and greater use of bikes and public transportation, could reduce emissions by a further 7 MtCO2e. With characteristic optimism, McKinsey suggests that the net cost would be zero, with negative cost activities such as efficient lighting and car engines offsetting more expensive measures such as solar power. McKinsey's estimates for large quantities of solar PV at a cost of under EUR10/tCO2e seems unduly sanguine. McKinsey cost curve Israel Ten measures account for about 2/3 of the reduction potential: Major measures As always, the core question is how to implement these measures. Just because more than half the abatement potential can be achieved at negative cost does not mean that it will occur spontaneously, due to the multitude of market failures and institutional hurdles (see McKinsey's Expanding Free Lunch Program). McKinsey recommends four rather uninspiring steps for the Israeli government to consider: 1. Establish ambitious national GHG abatement goals as government policy. 2. Formulate Israel's Low Carbon Growth Plan (LCGP) defining the mechanisms and timing of implementation. 3. Translate the national abatement plan into detailed operational measures including ways to finance the upfront investment. 4. Establish a central body to monitor progress in implementation. What is really needed, in Israel and elsewhere, is a much broader mobilization of the public, government agencies, and business to position climate change at the top of the agenda as the critical strategic threat of the century. At the same time, it offers unprecedented potential for innovation, economic transformation, and regional collaborations. Outside the clean tech sector, Israeli business does not yet take climate seriously - my own research shows that the best way to shift perspectives is to engage people with leaders in the field. In addition to the targets and implementation plans, the Israeli government could partner with charismatic climate champions such as Shai Agassi and local clean tech companies to promote the issue and organize a high profile conference of international businesspeople, policymakers, and experts to jumpstart the process and generate local commitment. * Share this post Filed under: carbon footprint, carbon regulation, clean energy, energy efficiency by David Levy One Response to "Climate Change and Clean Tech in Israel" 1. Karin January 14th, 2010 at 3:01 am David, We blogged about your story here: http://www.greenprophet.com/2010/01/14/16198/carbon-footprint-israel/ -Karin Leave a Reply _________________________________________ Name (required) _________________________________________ Email (will not be published) (required) _________________________________________ Website _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ [ Submit Comment ] * Keep up with ClimateInc Loading... Loading... __________________________ [ Subscribe ] [IMG] Subscribe to RSS * * A blog by Dr. David L. Levy * Recent Posts * Chaos and Confusion on Weather and Climate * Marketing and Energy Efficiency in Mobile Telecoms * Smart grid faces implementation hurdles * Upsetting the Offset * BP's Exit from USCAP: An Alarm Signal? * SEC Guidance a Boost for Carbon Disclosure * Beyond Brokenhagen * Cleantech's Unsung Heroes * Climate Change and Clean Tech in Israel * Sustainable Energy: Perspectives from the US and Europe * Unleashing Exxon's Resources for Low-Carbon Fuels * McKinsey's Expanding Free Lunch Program * Categories * book review * carbon accounting * carbon footprint * carbon management * carbon markets * carbon regulation * clean energy * clean energy investing * climate education * climate system * energy efficiency * finance * green jobs * political strategy * product labeling * strategy * venture capital * Recent Comments * Jeff Masse on Upsetting the Offset * Carbon Emissions - Management Challenges << Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability on Carbon Counting Confusion * John Shideler on SEC Guidance a Boost for Carbon Disclosure * Rhea on The Age of Wisdom? * Archives * April 2010 (1) * March 2010 (3) * February 2010 (3) * January 2010 (3) * December 2009 (2) * November 2009 (3) * October 2009 (4) * September 2009 (5) * August 2009 (10) * July 2009 (2) * Tags abatement API astroturf bailout batteries behavioral economics biofuels BP cap-and-trade carbon price carbon software CDP clean tech climate collapse climate feedbacks climate management climate shock competitiveness complexity core competencies Dorgan Exxon finance financial meltdown GCC Gelbspan investment Israel Kerry-Boxer Krugman market failure McKinsey methane offsets offshoring oil peak oil Pepsico Shell solar Tesco USCAP Walmart Waxman-Markey wind * Main Menu * About Climate Inc. * About the Editor * Keep in Touch * Resources Powered by WordPress | Custom theme by H2O | Boysen